<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753223</link>
    <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming service tax demand on appellant for renting of immovable property services and business support services. Following precedent in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital case, the Tribunal found appellant did not provide renting of immovable property service. The order remanding miscellaneous receipts matter to adjudicating authority was upheld. Penalties imposed on appellant were set aside. Appeal allowed partially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 08:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753223</link>
      <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming service tax demand on appellant for renting of immovable property services and business support services. Following precedent in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital case, the Tribunal found appellant did not provide renting of immovable property service. The order remanding miscellaneous receipts matter to adjudicating authority was upheld. Penalties imposed on appellant were set aside. Appeal allowed partially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>