<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2029 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314255</link>
    <description>The SC granted a stay on the judgment referenced by the Petitioner, preventing coercive tax recovery. The interim order was modified, allowing Respondents to proceed with assessments but prohibiting coercive recovery actions. The writ petition was adjourned sine die, with parties permitted to request a listing post-SC decision in related appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 20:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2029 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314255</link>
      <description>The SC granted a stay on the judgment referenced by the Petitioner, preventing coercive tax recovery. The interim order was modified, allowing Respondents to proceed with assessments but prohibiting coercive recovery actions. The writ petition was adjourned sine die, with parties permitted to request a listing post-SC decision in related appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>