https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314257 A writ petition seeking quashing of an order refusing defreezing of a bank account and a direction to defreeze was found unsustainable because the record did not show any material that the investigating agency had frozen any account. The banks where the petitioner held accounts were not impleaded, and no relief was sought against them. Ongoing further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC and the petitioner's failure to show compliance with the compromise-related deposit undertaking also weighed against relief. In the absence of proof of freezing, no order for defreezing could be passed, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2024 20:36:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314257 A writ petition seeking quashing of an order refusing defreezing of a bank account and a direction to defreeze was found unsustainable because the record did not show any material that the investigating agency had frozen any account. The banks where the petitioner held accounts were not impleaded, and no relief was sought against them. Ongoing further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC and the petitioner's failure to show compliance with the compromise-related deposit undertaking also weighed against relief. In the absence of proof of freezing, no order for defreezing could be passed, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314257