<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1385 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314264</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the petitioner&#039;s bank account in Wayanad did not establish jurisdiction. The cause of action was linked to the assessment order in Ootty, Tamilnadu. Consequently, all pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed following this jurisdictional determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 20:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1385 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314264</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the petitioner&#039;s bank account in Wayanad did not establish jurisdiction. The cause of action was linked to the assessment order in Ootty, Tamilnadu. Consequently, all pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed following this jurisdictional determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>