https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314251 Where an employer's failure to perform its obligations caused delay, interruption of work, longer transport routes for quarry material, and absence of a dumping site, the contractor could recover additional costs incurred during the extended period of performance. The Court noted that the absence of a price-escalation clause, and a supplemental agreement restricting enhanced rates, did not bar compensation for delay-driven extra expenditure when the claims arose from the actual consequences of the disrupted work. On that basis, the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction in granting escalation-related claims, and the award was restored after the High Court's interference was found erroneous. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2024 16:11:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314251 Where an employer's failure to perform its obligations caused delay, interruption of work, longer transport routes for quarry material, and absence of a dumping site, the contractor could recover additional costs incurred during the extended period of performance. The Court noted that the absence of a price-escalation clause, and a supplemental agreement restricting enhanced rates, did not bar compensation for delay-driven extra expenditure when the claims arose from the actual consequences of the disrupted work. On that basis, the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction in granting escalation-related claims, and the award was restored after the High Court's interference was found erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314251