<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753203</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision under section 263. The CIT contended that Rs 1 crore income surrendered during survey should be taxed under section 68 read with section 115BBE at 60% rate rather than as business income. The tribunal held that since the assessee was a doctor and the additional income was offered as business income from her profession, with no evidence suggesting otherwise, the AO correctly assessed it as business income. The income did not constitute unexplained cash credit under section 68, making section 115BBE inapplicable. The CIT&#039;s revision jurisdiction was improperly invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 10:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753203</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision under section 263. The CIT contended that Rs 1 crore income surrendered during survey should be taxed under section 68 read with section 115BBE at 60% rate rather than as business income. The tribunal held that since the assessee was a doctor and the additional income was offered as business income from her profession, with no evidence suggesting otherwise, the AO correctly assessed it as business income. The income did not constitute unexplained cash credit under section 68, making section 115BBE inapplicable. The CIT&#039;s revision jurisdiction was improperly invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>