https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314249 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial court and first appellate court should not be disturbed merely because another view of the evidence is possible. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had wrongly reappreciated the record, despite the findings resting on the registered sale deed and the Local Commissioner's report, and had interfered without showing any error of law or procedure. The judgment stressed that interference with concurrent factual findings is confined to legal or procedural error. The High Court's decision was therefore reversed and the dismissal of the suit restored. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2024 07:36:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314249 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial court and first appellate court should not be disturbed merely because another view of the evidence is possible. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had wrongly reappreciated the record, despite the findings resting on the registered sale deed and the Local Commissioner's report, and had interfered without showing any error of law or procedure. The judgment stressed that interference with concurrent factual findings is confined to legal or procedural error. The High Court's decision was therefore reversed and the dismissal of the suit restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314249