<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753199</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax officer to process the refund claim under CGST Act within two weeks. No deficiency memo was issued within the statutory 60-day period. The court provided the petitioner the right to pursue additional legal remedies if dissatisfied with the subsequent refund order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753199</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax officer to process the refund claim under CGST Act within two weeks. No deficiency memo was issued within the statutory 60-day period. The court provided the petitioner the right to pursue additional legal remedies if dissatisfied with the subsequent refund order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>