<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1251 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753198</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in light of the petitioner&#039;s compliance with interim bail conditions, which the State did not dispute. The Court took into account the nature of the allegations, the facts of the case, and the fact that the petitioner had already undergone more than two months of pre-trial incarceration. On that basis, further custody was not justified and bail was granted, with the interim order made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1251 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753198</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in light of the petitioner&#039;s compliance with interim bail conditions, which the State did not dispute. The Court took into account the nature of the allegations, the facts of the case, and the fact that the petitioner had already undergone more than two months of pre-trial incarceration. On that basis, further custody was not justified and bail was granted, with the interim order made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>