<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753196</link>
    <description>The writ petition concerned the GST amnesty scheme for waiver of late fee on delayed filing of the annual return under Notification No. 7/2023-CT, as amended by Notification No. 25/2023-CT. The respondents did not dispute the scheme and stated that the petitioner&#039;s representation would be considered under the notification. The Court therefore directed consideration of the representation in terms of the amended scheme and kept the enquiry in abeyance until that decision was taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753196</link>
      <description>The writ petition concerned the GST amnesty scheme for waiver of late fee on delayed filing of the annual return under Notification No. 7/2023-CT, as amended by Notification No. 25/2023-CT. The respondents did not dispute the scheme and stated that the petitioner&#039;s representation would be considered under the notification. The Court therefore directed consideration of the representation in terms of the amended scheme and kept the enquiry in abeyance until that decision was taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>