<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1242 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753189</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal challenging jurisdiction and Leave Fare Concession exemption disallowance. The court held that jurisdiction properly vested with ITO, Ward-1(1), Bhilai through valid order u/s 120 by ACIT-1, Bhilai dated 24.09.2020, rejecting the argument that assumption of jurisdiction required transfer order u/s 127. The private salaried employee&#039;s claim regarding jurisdictional defect was unfounded. CIT(Appeals) order sustaining AO&#039;s disallowance of LFC exemption was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 07:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1242 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753189</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal challenging jurisdiction and Leave Fare Concession exemption disallowance. The court held that jurisdiction properly vested with ITO, Ward-1(1), Bhilai through valid order u/s 120 by ACIT-1, Bhilai dated 24.09.2020, rejecting the argument that assumption of jurisdiction required transfer order u/s 127. The private salaried employee&#039;s claim regarding jurisdictional defect was unfounded. CIT(Appeals) order sustaining AO&#039;s disallowance of LFC exemption was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>