<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Act: CIT&#039;s Power to Revise TPO Orders on CCDs Upheld; Clarificatory Amendment Confirmed Retrospective.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77874</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding orders u/s 92CA. The amendment to section 263 clarified the jurisdiction to revise such orders, addressing a lacuna highlighted in a previous case. The amendment was deemed clarificatory and retrospective. The CIT&#039;s jurisdiction to revise TPO orders u/s 92CA was upheld. The case involved international transactions on Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) deemed as hybrid instruments, not pure debt. The CIT&#039;s findings on the nature of CCDs were upheld, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments. The addendum introduced during revisionary proceedings was not considered. The CIT&#039;s decision on the ALP of interest paid on CCDs was supported, as the TPO&#039;s ac.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 07:35:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 07:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Act: CIT&#039;s Power to Revise TPO Orders on CCDs Upheld; Clarificatory Amendment Confirmed Retrospective.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77874</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding orders u/s 92CA. The amendment to section 263 clarified the jurisdiction to revise such orders, addressing a lacuna highlighted in a previous case. The amendment was deemed clarificatory and retrospective. The CIT&#039;s jurisdiction to revise TPO orders u/s 92CA was upheld. The case involved international transactions on Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) deemed as hybrid instruments, not pure debt. The CIT&#039;s findings on the nature of CCDs were upheld, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments. The addendum introduced during revisionary proceedings was not considered. The CIT&#039;s decision on the ALP of interest paid on CCDs was supported, as the TPO&#039;s ac.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 07:35:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>