<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36900</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax valuation of compensation receivable on compulsory acquisition, the relevant amount is the compensation finally and legally enforceable on the valuation date. Where the Civil and Sessions Judge had enhanced the award before the return was filed, that later adjudication superseded the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s earlier determination and the original award merged into it. The acquired asset was therefore to be valued at the enhanced compensation, not the amount first fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36900</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax valuation of compensation receivable on compulsory acquisition, the relevant amount is the compensation finally and legally enforceable on the valuation date. Where the Civil and Sessions Judge had enhanced the award before the return was filed, that later adjudication superseded the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s earlier determination and the original award merged into it. The acquired asset was therefore to be valued at the enhanced compensation, not the amount first fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>