https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753170 CESTAT Allahabad allowed appellant's appeal regarding CENVAT credit refund claim. The tribunal set aside the order denying refund of Rs.7,29,970/- which was rejected solely due to delay beyond six months in taking CENVAT credit, as this issue was previously settled in appellant's favor. However, the denial of refund for lunch/dinner charges (Rs.25,288/-) and pantry/mobile charges (Rs.10,043/-) was upheld as these were not covered under input services and appellant did not challenge this aspect. The impugned order was modified accordingly, with appeal partially allowed. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 May 2024 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753170 CESTAT Allahabad allowed appellant's appeal regarding CENVAT credit refund claim. The tribunal set aside the order denying refund of Rs.7,29,970/- which was rejected solely due to delay beyond six months in taking CENVAT credit, as this issue was previously settled in appellant's favor. However, the denial of refund for lunch/dinner charges (Rs.25,288/-) and pantry/mobile charges (Rs.10,043/-) was upheld as these were not covered under input services and appellant did not challenge this aspect. The impugned order was modified accordingly, with appeal partially allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753170