https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314230 The HC held that a recall application filed beyond the limitation period cannot be decided on merits unless delay is first condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that since the recall application was time-barred and accompanied by a condonation application, the delay must be condoned before proceeding with the recall. Additionally, the court ruled that quasi-judicial authorities lack inherent power to review their orders unless expressly conferred by statute. The petition was allowed, establishing that jurisdictional requirements must be satisfied before entertaining time-barred applications. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314230 The HC held that a recall application filed beyond the limitation period cannot be decided on merits unless delay is first condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that since the recall application was time-barred and accompanied by a condonation application, the delay must be condoned before proceeding with the recall. Additionally, the court ruled that quasi-judicial authorities lack inherent power to review their orders unless expressly conferred by statute. The petition was allowed, establishing that jurisdictional requirements must be satisfied before entertaining time-barred applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314230