https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231 SC held that HC exceeded jurisdiction in second appeal under Section 41 of Punjab Act, which mirrors pre-1976 CPC provisions. Following Pankajakshi precedent, second appeals are limited to legal errors, not factual findings. Trial court found plaintiff ready to perform contract and defendants aware of power of attorney holder's authority. HC improperly interfered with first appellate court's factual findings regarding power of attorney validity and financial capacity. SC set aside HC judgment, restored lower appellate court's decree granting specific performance with two months for balance payment. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231 SC held that HC exceeded jurisdiction in second appeal under Section 41 of Punjab Act, which mirrors pre-1976 CPC provisions. Following Pankajakshi precedent, second appeals are limited to legal errors, not factual findings. Trial court found plaintiff ready to perform contract and defendants aware of power of attorney holder's authority. HC improperly interfered with first appellate court's factual findings regarding power of attorney validity and financial capacity. SC set aside HC judgment, restored lower appellate court's decree granting specific performance with two months for balance payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231