https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231 In second appeal under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or disturb reasoned findings of fact unless a jurisdictional ground is shown, such as a decision contrary to law, an undetermined material issue of law or custom, or a substantial procedural defect affecting the merits. The first appellate court's findings that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform, earnest money had been paid, and the defendants had acted on the transaction were therefore not open to reversal merely because another view was possible. The decree for specific performance was restored, with the plaintiff's appearance on the next working day after a Sunday performance date also supporting enforcement. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231 In second appeal under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or disturb reasoned findings of fact unless a jurisdictional ground is shown, such as a decision contrary to law, an undetermined material issue of law or custom, or a substantial procedural defect affecting the merits. The first appellate court's findings that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform, earnest money had been paid, and the defendants had acted on the transaction were therefore not open to reversal merely because another view was possible. The decree for specific performance was restored, with the plaintiff's appearance on the next working day after a Sunday performance date also supporting enforcement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314231