https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314232 Section 100 CPC requires substantial questions of law to be framed so the parties have a fair opportunity to address them; framing or altering such questions at the hearing stage is permissible only in exceptional circumstances after notice and hearing, and the High Court's contrary approach was found improper. Concurrent findings of fact in second appeal can be disturbed only on recognised exceptional grounds such as perversity or lack of evidence, and that requires examination of the trial court record; absent such scrutiny and a legally sustainable basis, reversal is not justified. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration. en-us Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314232 Section 100 CPC requires substantial questions of law to be framed so the parties have a fair opportunity to address them; framing or altering such questions at the hearing stage is permissible only in exceptional circumstances after notice and hearing, and the High Court's contrary approach was found improper. Concurrent findings of fact in second appeal can be disturbed only on recognised exceptional grounds such as perversity or lack of evidence, and that requires examination of the trial court record; absent such scrutiny and a legally sustainable basis, reversal is not justified. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314232