https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229 A final order dismissing a second appeal after substantial questions of law had already been framed must still briefly explain why those questions are not substantial. A bare statement that no substantial question of law arises is insufficient where the appeal was admitted on formulated questions, because Section 100(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure contemplates a reasoned response to the respondent's contention. The Supreme Court held that the dismissal without reasons was unsustainable and directed restoration of the matter to the High Court for decision on merits under Section 100 CPC. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 13:10:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229 A final order dismissing a second appeal after substantial questions of law had already been framed must still briefly explain why those questions are not substantial. A bare statement that no substantial question of law arises is insufficient where the appeal was admitted on formulated questions, because Section 100(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure contemplates a reasoned response to the respondent's contention. The Supreme Court held that the dismissal without reasons was unsustainable and directed restoration of the matter to the High Court for decision on merits under Section 100 CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229