<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 1002 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229</link>
    <description>The SC granted leave for an appeal from a second appeal where the Single Judge initially admitted it based on substantial questions of law but later dismissed it, claiming no substantial questions arose. The SC found this contradictory and set aside the dismissal, restoring the second appeal to the HC for a hearing on merits as per Section 100 CPC. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 13:10:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 1002 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229</link>
      <description>The SC granted leave for an appeal from a second appeal where the Single Judge initially admitted it based on substantial questions of law but later dismissed it, claiming no substantial questions arose. The SC found this contradictory and set aside the dismissal, restoring the second appeal to the HC for a hearing on merits as per Section 100 CPC. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>