https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314228 Section 100 CPC confines second appeals to substantial questions of law, and after the 1976 amendment the High Court must formulate that question and hear the appeal on it before interfering with the first appellate decree. Where no substantial question of law is framed or decided, reversal of concurrent findings of fact is not sustainable. The note states that the impugned judgment could not stand and was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 12:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314228 Section 100 CPC confines second appeals to substantial questions of law, and after the 1976 amendment the High Court must formulate that question and hear the appeal on it before interfering with the first appellate decree. Where no substantial question of law is framed or decided, reversal of concurrent findings of fact is not sustainable. The note states that the impugned judgment could not stand and was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314228