<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 728 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the second petition u/s 482 CrPC, finding it not maintainable and the legal plea unsustainable. The court emphasized the necessity of sworn statements alongside complaint text for compliance with Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Judicial Magistrate was directed to conclude the case within three months, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 12:10:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 728 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the second petition u/s 482 CrPC, finding it not maintainable and the legal plea unsustainable. The court emphasized the necessity of sworn statements alongside complaint text for compliance with Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Judicial Magistrate was directed to conclude the case within three months, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>