https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226 A successive petition under Section 482 CrPC was held not maintainable where an earlier quashing request had already been rejected and no material change in circumstances was shown; a ground available earlier cannot be reserved for a later petition seeking the same relief. The complaint was also held sufficient to resist quashing because, read as a whole with the sworn statement, it contained the essential averments of dishonour, statutory notice, and non-payment under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Isolated omission of particular wording did not defeat the substance of the statutory requirements, and the proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 12:10:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226 A successive petition under Section 482 CrPC was held not maintainable where an earlier quashing request had already been rejected and no material change in circumstances was shown; a ground available earlier cannot be reserved for a later petition seeking the same relief. The complaint was also held sufficient to resist quashing because, read as a whole with the sworn statement, it contained the essential averments of dishonour, statutory notice, and non-payment under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Isolated omission of particular wording did not defeat the substance of the statutory requirements, and the proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314226