<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Allows Provisional Release of Seized Goods, Overturns Tribunal; Requires Bond and Bank Guarantee for Compliance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77847</link>
    <description>The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to valuation and duty discrepancies of imported cutting blades. The Court held that a Circular from 2017 was superseded by a 2018 amendment exempting cases with provisional release from the time limit for issuing show cause notices. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. Two conditions were imposed for provisional release: execution of a bond and a bank guarantee. The Court affirmed the bond condition but directed the respondent to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- and a bond for Rs. 40,00,000/- to protect revenue interests. Upon compliance with the conditions, the seized goods would be provisionally released within 10 days. The appeal was disposed of, and the application closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Allows Provisional Release of Seized Goods, Overturns Tribunal; Requires Bond and Bank Guarantee for Compliance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77847</link>
      <description>The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to valuation and duty discrepancies of imported cutting blades. The Court held that a Circular from 2017 was superseded by a 2018 amendment exempting cases with provisional release from the time limit for issuing show cause notices. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. Two conditions were imposed for provisional release: execution of a bond and a bank guarantee. The Court affirmed the bond condition but directed the respondent to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- and a bond for Rs. 40,00,000/- to protect revenue interests. Upon compliance with the conditions, the seized goods would be provisionally released within 10 days. The appeal was disposed of, and the application closed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>