<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules High Court Can&#039;t Issue Writs to Private Entities Post-Public Sector Privatization.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77833</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking (PSU) - The issue was whether the High Court could exercise writ jurisdiction over a private entity. The employee-writ petitioner argued that the petition was maintainable against the respondent at the time of filing. Various High Courts had held that a government company becoming a private entity would make it immune from writ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the High Court could not issue a writ to a private entity that had taken over during the pendency of the case. The delay in disposal of the writ petitions was considered a valid ground to continue the case, b.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules High Court Can&#039;t Issue Writs to Private Entities Post-Public Sector Privatization.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77833</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking (PSU) - The issue was whether the High Court could exercise writ jurisdiction over a private entity. The employee-writ petitioner argued that the petition was maintainable against the respondent at the time of filing. Various High Courts had held that a government company becoming a private entity would make it immune from writ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the High Court could not issue a writ to a private entity that had taken over during the pendency of the case. The delay in disposal of the writ petitions was considered a valid ground to continue the case, b.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 08:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>