<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1905 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed an appeal in a suit for declaration and specific performance, maintaining the status-quo order. The court found triable issues requiring proper adjudication, noting plaintiff&#039;s readiness and willingness evidenced by payment of Rs. 2.16 crores and readiness to pay balance Rs. 27.84 crores. Defendant&#039;s unilateral return of money required examination. The court held that during litigation when a case is made out, status-quo deserves protection regardless of transaction value or proceedings duration, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and preserve subject matter. The trial court must examine whether continuous negotiations constituted a binding contract through evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2024 14:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1905 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed an appeal in a suit for declaration and specific performance, maintaining the status-quo order. The court found triable issues requiring proper adjudication, noting plaintiff&#039;s readiness and willingness evidenced by payment of Rs. 2.16 crores and readiness to pay balance Rs. 27.84 crores. Defendant&#039;s unilateral return of money required examination. The court held that during litigation when a case is made out, status-quo deserves protection regardless of transaction value or proceedings duration, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and preserve subject matter. The trial court must examine whether continuous negotiations constituted a binding contract through evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>