https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223 In a specific performance dispute over immovable property, the High Court reiterated that an appellate court should not interfere with a temporary injunction at the interlocutory stage unless the trial court's discretion is perverse, arbitrary, or contrary to settled principles. The record showed serious triable issues on whether negotiations had matured into a concluded or oral contract, whether the payment was part consideration, whether readiness and willingness was established, and whether the defendant had backed out after creating an impression that execution was imminent. On that basis, preservation of the suit property and maintenance of status quo during trial were upheld. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 May 2024 14:22:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223 In a specific performance dispute over immovable property, the High Court reiterated that an appellate court should not interfere with a temporary injunction at the interlocutory stage unless the trial court's discretion is perverse, arbitrary, or contrary to settled principles. The record showed serious triable issues on whether negotiations had matured into a concluded or oral contract, whether the payment was part consideration, whether readiness and willingness was established, and whether the defendant had backed out after creating an impression that execution was imminent. On that basis, preservation of the suit property and maintenance of status quo during trial were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314223