<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1383 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314216</link>
    <description>Section 194LBC applies only to income payable to an investor in respect of investment in a securitisation trust, and the term &quot;investor&quot; is tied to a holder of a securitised debt instrument or security receipt. On the stated facts, the originator had not subscribed to PTCs or any investment in the trust; its retention was through cash collateral and collateralisation of excess receivables, and the assignment deed did not create an investment instrument. Excess Interest Spread was treated as a residual amount for creating the receivables pool, not income from investment in the trust, so TDS was held not deductible under section 194LBC and liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) did not arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1383 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314216</link>
      <description>Section 194LBC applies only to income payable to an investor in respect of investment in a securitisation trust, and the term &quot;investor&quot; is tied to a holder of a securitised debt instrument or security receipt. On the stated facts, the originator had not subscribed to PTCs or any investment in the trust; its retention was through cash collateral and collateralisation of excess receivables, and the assignment deed did not create an investment instrument. Excess Interest Spread was treated as a residual amount for creating the receivables pool, not income from investment in the trust, so TDS was held not deductible under section 194LBC and liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) did not arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>