<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1188 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753135</link>
    <description>HC allowed appeal challenging adjudication order, remanding case back to authority. Court directed reconsideration of GSTR-9 annual return filed for 2017-18, noting Covid-19 extended filing period and revenue-neutral nature of tax discrepancy. Appellant&#039;s unintentional error was to be examined afresh without treating the order as precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1188 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753135</link>
      <description>HC allowed appeal challenging adjudication order, remanding case back to authority. Court directed reconsideration of GSTR-9 annual return filed for 2017-18, noting Covid-19 extended filing period and revenue-neutral nature of tax discrepancy. Appellant&#039;s unintentional error was to be examined afresh without treating the order as precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>