<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HC: Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 OR u/s 153C/153A - basis for reopening assessment must be material from search.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77804</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148/148A OR u/s 153C/153A based on material/information collected during a search from another/third party. The Court held that reassessment must be conducted u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A, not u/s 148A/148. The basis for reopening the assessment was material from a search on another assessee, not new incriminating material. The petitioner argued that the assessment should have been reopened u/s 153C within the limitation period, not u/s 148/148A. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that reassessment based on search material must follow u/s 153C, not u/s 148.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 08:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 08:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HC: Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 OR u/s 153C/153A - basis for reopening assessment must be material from search.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77804</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148/148A OR u/s 153C/153A based on material/information collected during a search from another/third party. The Court held that reassessment must be conducted u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A, not u/s 148A/148. The basis for reopening the assessment was material from a search on another assessee, not new incriminating material. The petitioner argued that the assessment should have been reopened u/s 153C within the limitation period, not u/s 148/148A. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that reassessment based on search material must follow u/s 153C, not u/s 148.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 08:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>