<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1163 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753110</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur partly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on three grounds. Regarding disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D, tribunal held no interest expenditure disallowance warranted as assessee had sufficient self-owned funds for exempt income investments, following HC Bombay and SC precedents. Administrative expenditure disallowance was upheld. For addition u/s 41(1) regarding cessation of liability, matter was restored to AO for re-adjudication with proper opportunity to assessee, as AO failed to establish trading liability cessation. Regarding TCS credit claim, tribunal upheld AO&#039;s decision to decline credit for current year but directed allowance in subsequent year when coal purchase transaction materialized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 08:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1163 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753110</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur partly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on three grounds. Regarding disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D, tribunal held no interest expenditure disallowance warranted as assessee had sufficient self-owned funds for exempt income investments, following HC Bombay and SC precedents. Administrative expenditure disallowance was upheld. For addition u/s 41(1) regarding cessation of liability, matter was restored to AO for re-adjudication with proper opportunity to assessee, as AO failed to establish trading liability cessation. Regarding TCS credit claim, tribunal upheld AO&#039;s decision to decline credit for current year but directed allowance in subsequent year when coal purchase transaction materialized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>