<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1157 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the benefit of the Notification under ISFTA to the appellant, despite the initial failure to claim it at the time of filing the Bill of Entry. The Tribunal referenced a decision by the Hon&#039;ble HC of Bombay, concluding that the benefit should not be denied solely on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 08:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1157 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the benefit of the Notification under ISFTA to the appellant, despite the initial failure to claim it at the time of filing the Bill of Entry. The Tribunal referenced a decision by the Hon&#039;ble HC of Bombay, concluding that the benefit should not be denied solely on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>