<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1151 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753098</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal by a tax authority seeking treatment of VAT/Sales Tax dues as secured claims during liquidation. The tribunal held that assessment orders passed during moratorium under Section 14 of IBC were correctly classified as unsecured operational debt. The appellant illegally maintained property attachments despite court orders to lift them. Unlike the Rainbow Paper case involving VAT Act provisions granting first charge rights, Gujarat Sales Tax Act contained no similar secured creditor provisions. The tribunal rejected arguments that the 330-day resolution timeline was mandatory, noting it was directory in nature. The resolution plan approved by CoC properly classified tax dues as unsecured debts under Section 53 waterfall arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1151 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753098</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal by a tax authority seeking treatment of VAT/Sales Tax dues as secured claims during liquidation. The tribunal held that assessment orders passed during moratorium under Section 14 of IBC were correctly classified as unsecured operational debt. The appellant illegally maintained property attachments despite court orders to lift them. Unlike the Rainbow Paper case involving VAT Act provisions granting first charge rights, Gujarat Sales Tax Act contained no similar secured creditor provisions. The tribunal rejected arguments that the 330-day resolution timeline was mandatory, noting it was directory in nature. The resolution plan approved by CoC properly classified tax dues as unsecured debts under Section 53 waterfall arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>