<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314209</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that investigating agencies possess statutory right to conduct further investigation even after filing chargesheet without requiring prior permission from Magistrate. Court relied on SC precedents establishing that investigation is permissible while reinvestigation is prohibited, and Section 173(8) CrPC provides unfettered right to further investigate when fresh evidence emerges. Magistrate must accept supplementary chargesheets and consider consolidated effect of all reports before framing charges. Mere possibility of trial delay cannot prevent further investigation if it aids in arriving at truth and ensuring substantial justice. Petition disposed of allowing continued investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 20:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314209</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that investigating agencies possess statutory right to conduct further investigation even after filing chargesheet without requiring prior permission from Magistrate. Court relied on SC precedents establishing that investigation is permissible while reinvestigation is prohibited, and Section 173(8) CrPC provides unfettered right to further investigate when fresh evidence emerges. Magistrate must accept supplementary chargesheets and consider consolidated effect of all reports before framing charges. Mere possibility of trial delay cannot prevent further investigation if it aids in arriving at truth and ensuring substantial justice. Petition disposed of allowing continued investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>