<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36874</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the sum of Rs. 49,479 could not be considered for calculating additional super-tax as it was not incurred during the relevant accounting period. The court ruled that the expenditure should not impact determining if profits were sufficient for a higher dividend distribution. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s position was upheld, answering question No. 1 in favor of the revenue. Question No. 2 was not addressed. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36874</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the sum of Rs. 49,479 could not be considered for calculating additional super-tax as it was not incurred during the relevant accounting period. The court ruled that the expenditure should not impact determining if profits were sufficient for a higher dividend distribution. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s position was upheld, answering question No. 1 in favor of the revenue. Question No. 2 was not addressed. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>