<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753082</link>
    <description>The SC examined the prosecutorial permission under CGST Act, emphasizing administrative independence in determining prosecution. The court held that the Commissioner must independently assess prosecution eligibility, without being influenced by prior adjudication proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s absence from initial proceedings and potential pre-judging of issues were key concerns. The writ petition was disposed of, directing an independent review of prosecution permission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753082</link>
      <description>The SC examined the prosecutorial permission under CGST Act, emphasizing administrative independence in determining prosecution. The court held that the Commissioner must independently assess prosecution eligibility, without being influenced by prior adjudication proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s absence from initial proceedings and potential pre-judging of issues were key concerns. The writ petition was disposed of, directing an independent review of prosecution permission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>