https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753071 The AP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court held there was no violation of natural justice as petitioner received show cause notice but failed to respond. Regarding limitation, the court clarified that while refund claims have specific time limits per SC precedent in Godrej Sara Lee, writ petitions don't have a fixed three-year limitation, though courts must consider unexplained delays. The court found no hearing requirement for suspension orders passed during pending cancellation proceedings, as no legal provision mandated such opportunity before suspension. en-us Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 May 2024 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753071 The AP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court held there was no violation of natural justice as petitioner received show cause notice but failed to respond. Regarding limitation, the court clarified that while refund claims have specific time limits per SC precedent in Godrej Sara Lee, writ petitions don't have a fixed three-year limitation, though courts must consider unexplained delays. The court found no hearing requirement for suspension orders passed during pending cancellation proceedings, as no legal provision mandated such opportunity before suspension. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753071