<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate tribunal grants refund with interest for service tax paid under protest; allows CENVAT credit distribution to manufacturing units.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77760</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Allahabad Appellate Tribunal ruled in a case involving the demand of service tax for services rendered by a non-resident from a country outside India related to the issuance of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCB) falling under banking and financial services. The appellant had paid the service tax under protest and deposited the amount demanded during the investigation. The tribunal held that the demand of service tax against the appellant was dropped, entitling them to a refund of the amount paid along with interest. The appellant had taken CENVAT credit of the amount deposited and distributed it to their manufacturing units as they were registered as an input service distributor. The tribunal found no reason to disallow th.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 08:07:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 07:12:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate tribunal grants refund with interest for service tax paid under protest; allows CENVAT credit distribution to manufacturing units.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77760</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Allahabad Appellate Tribunal ruled in a case involving the demand of service tax for services rendered by a non-resident from a country outside India related to the issuance of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCB) falling under banking and financial services. The appellant had paid the service tax under protest and deposited the amount demanded during the investigation. The tribunal held that the demand of service tax against the appellant was dropped, entitling them to a refund of the amount paid along with interest. The appellant had taken CENVAT credit of the amount deposited and distributed it to their manufacturing units as they were registered as an input service distributor. The tribunal found no reason to disallow th.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 08:07:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>