<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1120 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753067</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to absence of valid notice under section 148. The jurisdictional AO (ACIT Circle-24(2), Hooghly) admitted lack of jurisdiction over the assessee, with correct jurisdiction lying with ACIT Circle-23(1), Hooghly. Since no fresh notice under section 148 was issued by the jurisdictional officer, the reassessment proceedings were deemed illegal and bad in law. All additions made during reassessment were deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 07:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1120 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753067</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to absence of valid notice under section 148. The jurisdictional AO (ACIT Circle-24(2), Hooghly) admitted lack of jurisdiction over the assessee, with correct jurisdiction lying with ACIT Circle-23(1), Hooghly. Since no fresh notice under section 148 was issued by the jurisdictional officer, the reassessment proceedings were deemed illegal and bad in law. All additions made during reassessment were deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>