<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 20 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36869</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee-company did not qualify as an investment company under section 109(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as loans and advances were not considered investments. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from loans did not meet the criteria for classification as investments, as they did not result in the acquisition of income-yielding property. The assessee was awarded costs for the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 20 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36869</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee-company did not qualify as an investment company under section 109(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as loans and advances were not considered investments. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from loans did not meet the criteria for classification as investments, as they did not result in the acquisition of income-yielding property. The assessee was awarded costs for the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>