<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1514 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314198</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision for the 2012-13 assessment year. The HC found no substantial question of law regarding the necessity of issuing a notice u/s 143(2) for an assessment order u/s 143(3). Consequently, the appeal [ITAT/221/2022] and the associated application [GA/2/2022] were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1514 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314198</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision for the 2012-13 assessment year. The HC found no substantial question of law regarding the necessity of issuing a notice u/s 143(2) for an assessment order u/s 143(3). Consequently, the appeal [ITAT/221/2022] and the associated application [GA/2/2022] were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>