<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1748 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314192</link>
    <description>Licences over port plots created no indefeasible right to renewal or continued possession, because a licence under the Easements Act confers no interest in property and any renewal remained only an administrative permission. The Board was entitled to terminate the licences for bona fide public port development and improved operational efficiency, which was a legitimate statutory purpose. As no vested right prevented revocation and the challenge raised no substantive bar to termination, the Court declined relief and upheld the Board&#039;s action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1748 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314192</link>
      <description>Licences over port plots created no indefeasible right to renewal or continued possession, because a licence under the Easements Act confers no interest in property and any renewal remained only an administrative permission. The Board was entitled to terminate the licences for bona fide public port development and improved operational efficiency, which was a legitimate statutory purpose. As no vested right prevented revocation and the challenge raised no substantive bar to termination, the Court declined relief and upheld the Board&#039;s action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>