<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Hyderabad upheld Corporate Guarantee Commission at 0.53% for foreign AEs. Interest on Trade Receivables benchmarked at 6% SBI rate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77749</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the Corporate Guarantee Commission at 0.53% for guarantees to foreign AEs, rejecting the AO&#039;s 1.8% rate. The tribunal determined the pro rata guarantee at 30.50% of a $10 million loan balance. The CIT(A) classified corporate guarantees as international transactions and set the commission at 0.53%. Interest on trade receivables was benchmarked at 6% SBI rate. The tribunal remanded R&amp;D, Head Office, and Marketing expenses issues back to the AO/TPO for fresh assessment, citing a violation of natural justice. The tribunal directed the assessee to provide segmental accounts for accurate benchmarking. The tribunal excluded certain comparables based on RPT filter agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:31:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Hyderabad upheld Corporate Guarantee Commission at 0.53% for foreign AEs. Interest on Trade Receivables benchmarked at 6% SBI rate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77749</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the Corporate Guarantee Commission at 0.53% for guarantees to foreign AEs, rejecting the AO&#039;s 1.8% rate. The tribunal determined the pro rata guarantee at 30.50% of a $10 million loan balance. The CIT(A) classified corporate guarantees as international transactions and set the commission at 0.53%. Interest on trade receivables was benchmarked at 6% SBI rate. The tribunal remanded R&amp;D, Head Office, and Marketing expenses issues back to the AO/TPO for fresh assessment, citing a violation of natural justice. The tribunal directed the assessee to provide segmental accounts for accurate benchmarking. The tribunal excluded certain comparables based on RPT filter agreement.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:31:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>