<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314173</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court permitted the assessee to treat the assessment proceedings as show cause notices and file objections, because the impugned order had not addressed the assessee&#039;s explanation or the statements recorded during the VAT audit. The court granted this further opportunity on a condition precedent: payment of 15% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time. If that payment was not made, the department was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 08:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314173</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court permitted the assessee to treat the assessment proceedings as show cause notices and file objections, because the impugned order had not addressed the assessee&#039;s explanation or the statements recorded during the VAT audit. The court granted this further opportunity on a condition precedent: payment of 15% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time. If that payment was not made, the department was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>