<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1587 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that liquidated damages and penalties recovered by the Appellant from suppliers for contractual delays do not constitute consideration for a declared service under s. 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, these amounts are not subject to service tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order, and granted the Appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 08:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1587 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that liquidated damages and penalties recovered by the Appellant from suppliers for contractual delays do not constitute consideration for a declared service under s. 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, these amounts are not subject to service tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order, and granted the Appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>