<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 65 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36860</link>
    <description>Annuity deposit repayments were treated as income under Chapter XXII-A and section 2(24)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because section 280D deems the annual instalments received under the scheme to be taxable receipts. Even where a Hindu undivided family had disrupted, the karta or erstwhile member who had made the deposit remained the depositor in the formal sense for the scheme, so repayment did not fall outside taxation merely because of disruption. The principal component was also taxable, since the statute expressly brought the repayment within income and did not preserve it as exempt capital return. The annuity repayment attributable to the assessee&#039;s share was therefore chargeable to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 65 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36860</link>
      <description>Annuity deposit repayments were treated as income under Chapter XXII-A and section 2(24)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because section 280D deems the annual instalments received under the scheme to be taxable receipts. Even where a Hindu undivided family had disrupted, the karta or erstwhile member who had made the deposit remained the depositor in the formal sense for the scheme, so repayment did not fall outside taxation merely because of disruption. The principal component was also taxable, since the statute expressly brought the repayment within income and did not preserve it as exempt capital return. The annuity repayment attributable to the assessee&#039;s share was therefore chargeable to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>