https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753046 ITAT Mumbai allowed AO's appeal against CIT(A)'s order, finding it was a "copy-paste" order passed without independent application of mind. The CIT(A) had decided different grounds than those raised by assessee, referenced wrong assessment orders, stated irrelevant facts, and reproduced incorrect grounds of appeal. ITAT held the appellate order was devoid of merit, unsustainable and perverse, directing CIT(A) to reconsider the case on merits after proper hearing. en-us Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 May 2024 08:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753046 ITAT Mumbai allowed AO's appeal against CIT(A)'s order, finding it was a "copy-paste" order passed without independent application of mind. The CIT(A) had decided different grounds than those raised by assessee, referenced wrong assessment orders, stated irrelevant facts, and reproduced incorrect grounds of appeal. ITAT held the appellate order was devoid of merit, unsustainable and perverse, directing CIT(A) to reconsider the case on merits after proper hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753046