<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36859</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat Rs. 30,000 and Rs. 25,000 as undisclosed income of the assessee, rejecting explanations provided for both amounts. The Tribunal found the explanations inadequate due to lack of evidence and plausibility. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the department, affirming the addition of Rs. 55,000 to the assessee&#039;s income and awarded costs of Rs. 200 to the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36859</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat Rs. 30,000 and Rs. 25,000 as undisclosed income of the assessee, rejecting explanations provided for both amounts. The Tribunal found the explanations inadequate due to lack of evidence and plausibility. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the department, affirming the addition of Rs. 55,000 to the assessee&#039;s income and awarded costs of Rs. 200 to the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>