<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1084 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753031</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, noting that there was no outstanding tax demand. The court acknowledged the corrective action taken by the revenue authorities, which included revoking all provisional attachments on the FDRs. The issue of improper attachment was resolved, and the petition was concluded with the release of the attachments, ensuring compliance with statutory safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 07:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1084 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753031</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, noting that there was no outstanding tax demand. The court acknowledged the corrective action taken by the revenue authorities, which included revoking all provisional attachments on the FDRs. The issue of improper attachment was resolved, and the petition was concluded with the release of the attachments, ensuring compliance with statutory safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>