<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1075 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753022</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the addition of Rs. 9,80,780/- for unexplained investments, determining that the assets were not acquired in the relevant year and that invoking section 69 was erroneous. The Tribunal also condoned a 408-day delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to the Chartered Accountant&#039;s health issues, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1075 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753022</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the addition of Rs. 9,80,780/- for unexplained investments, determining that the assets were not acquired in the relevant year and that invoking section 69 was erroneous. The Tribunal also condoned a 408-day delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to the Chartered Accountant&#039;s health issues, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>