<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1068 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753015</link>
    <description>ITAT Jodhpur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 68 for alleged bogus share application money. The assessee successfully established identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of investor companies, discharging primary onus. CIT(A) conducted detailed examination of each shareholder transaction and found share capital genuine. Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as no basis existed for the original addition. Commission expenses related to share applications were also deleted since underlying transactions were held genuine. Regarding reassessment validity, though CIT(A) deemed it academic, the issue remained open for consideration per established precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1068 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753015</link>
      <description>ITAT Jodhpur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 68 for alleged bogus share application money. The assessee successfully established identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of investor companies, discharging primary onus. CIT(A) conducted detailed examination of each shareholder transaction and found share capital genuine. Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as no basis existed for the original addition. Commission expenses related to share applications were also deleted since underlying transactions were held genuine. Regarding reassessment validity, though CIT(A) deemed it academic, the issue remained open for consideration per established precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>