<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36856</link>
    <description>Property transferred by a Hindu undivided family karta to his wife in discharge of her maintenance claim was held not to be a gift under the Gift-tax Act, because a transfer is gratuitous only when made voluntarily and without consideration in money or money&#039;s worth. The wife&#039;s right to maintenance under Hindu law and section 18(1) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, constituted pre-existing legal consideration in the form of quittance of a legal duty. As the Tribunal found the transfer arose from a family settlement at partition and was made in lieu of maintenance, it was not liable to gift-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36856</link>
      <description>Property transferred by a Hindu undivided family karta to his wife in discharge of her maintenance claim was held not to be a gift under the Gift-tax Act, because a transfer is gratuitous only when made voluntarily and without consideration in money or money&#039;s worth. The wife&#039;s right to maintenance under Hindu law and section 18(1) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, constituted pre-existing legal consideration in the form of quittance of a legal duty. As the Tribunal found the transfer arose from a family settlement at partition and was made in lieu of maintenance, it was not liable to gift-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>