<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1064 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753011</link>
    <description>A customs broker meets the Regulation 10(n) verification duty by checking the client&#039;s IEC, GSTIN, PAN and other KYC documents through reliable official sources, and is not required to physically inspect each exporter&#039;s premises or verify how government registrations were issued. Where the broker relies on genuine government-issued records and there is no evidence that the documents were forged, fake or suspect, later non-traceability of the exporter does not by itself establish non-compliance. On those facts, CESTAT held that revocation of the customs broker licence, forfeiture of the security deposit and penalty were not justified and set aside the impugned action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1064 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753011</link>
      <description>A customs broker meets the Regulation 10(n) verification duty by checking the client&#039;s IEC, GSTIN, PAN and other KYC documents through reliable official sources, and is not required to physically inspect each exporter&#039;s premises or verify how government registrations were issued. Where the broker relies on genuine government-issued records and there is no evidence that the documents were forged, fake or suspect, later non-traceability of the exporter does not by itself establish non-compliance. On those facts, CESTAT held that revocation of the customs broker licence, forfeiture of the security deposit and penalty were not justified and set aside the impugned action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>