<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753003</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal challenging recovery of service tax refund. The appellant had previously obtained refund orders from the Tribunal in similar cases involving services to a foreign entity, which attained finality as Revenue did not challenge them. Revenue later issued show cause notice under Section 11A of Central Excise Act seeking recovery of the refunded amount. CESTAT held that once Tribunal granted refund and order became final, authorities had no jurisdiction to recover the amount unless the refund order was stayed or set aside by higher forum. The lower authorities erred in ordering recovery and exceeded jurisdiction by criticizing Tribunal&#039;s decision. The impugned recovery order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753003</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal challenging recovery of service tax refund. The appellant had previously obtained refund orders from the Tribunal in similar cases involving services to a foreign entity, which attained finality as Revenue did not challenge them. Revenue later issued show cause notice under Section 11A of Central Excise Act seeking recovery of the refunded amount. CESTAT held that once Tribunal granted refund and order became final, authorities had no jurisdiction to recover the amount unless the refund order was stayed or set aside by higher forum. The lower authorities erred in ordering recovery and exceeded jurisdiction by criticizing Tribunal&#039;s decision. The impugned recovery order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>